[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nam does not work....
Sir,
I tried to use a file without 'v' but still it
complains of 'invalid command '+' '. I went through the
source code and 'v' was defined !. So usage of nam
may be different is it ?
-swami
On Mon, 29 Sep 1997, Haobo Yu wrote:
> Hi, Swami,
>
> Have you tried to remove the 'v' lines and run nam with the rest?
>
> If my memory is correct, I think it should accept 'd', '+', '-'. But I'm
> not sure whether 'v' will work, because it's added later, and the
> corresponding modification in nam may not be included in that early
> version.
>
> Please correct me if there is a mistake above.
>
> - Haobo
>
> On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, Mr.N.Swaminathan. wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I compiled nam version 0.8 and tried to
> > see trace files from ns. I converted to nam format
> > using the programs available with ns. But nam
> > complains of "invalid command 'v'" i.e., it is
> > not accepting any letters 'd,-,+,v' in the
> > first column. Is that a bug or have I made a mistake.
> > I saw the man page of nam and the formate is ok.
> >
> > Many thanks in advance.
> >
> > -swami
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>