[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: nam does not work....



Sir,

	I tried to use a file without 'v' but still it 
complains of 'invalid command '+' '. I went through the
source code and 'v' was defined !. So usage of nam
may be different is it ?

-swami

On Mon, 29 Sep 1997, Haobo Yu wrote:

> Hi, Swami,
> 
> Have you tried to remove the 'v' lines and run nam with the rest?
> 
> If my memory is correct, I think it should accept 'd', '+', '-'. But I'm
> not sure whether 'v' will work, because it's added later, and the
> corresponding modification in nam may not be included in that early
> version.
> 
> Please correct me if there is a mistake above.
> 
> - Haobo 
> 
> On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, Mr.N.Swaminathan. wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 	I compiled nam version 0.8 and tried to
> > see trace files from ns. I converted to nam format
> > using the programs available with ns. But nam
> > complains of "invalid command 'v'" i.e., it is
> > not accepting any letters 'd,-,+,v' in the 
> > first column. Is that a bug or have I made a mistake.
> > I saw the man page of nam and the formate is ok.
> > 
> > Many thanks in advance.
> > 
> > -swami
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>