[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Installation problem.



Hi,
 
    I am installing ns on a windows NT machine using visual c++ 6.0.
 
 I finished installing tclcl but when i go to ns the installation stops
 with this error message:
 
         cl -c -Ox -c -W3 -DCRTAPI1=_cdecl -DCRTAPI2=_cdecl -nologo
 -D_X86_=1 -D_
 WIN32_IE=0x0300 -DWINVER=0x0400 -DWIN32  -D_WIN32 -D_MT -D_DLL -MD -Ox
 -Zm1000 -
 DNO_TK -I..\tk8.1.1\win -I..\tk8.1.1\generic -I..\tcl8.1.1\win
 -I..\tcl8.1.1\gen
 eric  -I..\otcl-1.0a4 -I..\tclcl-1.0b8-current  -I..\tk8.1.1\xlib  -I.
 -ID:\Stud
 io\Vc98\include -Fogen\\ptypes.o -Tp gen\\ptypes.cc
 ptypes.cc
 gen\\ptypes.cc(104) : error C2026: string too big, trailing characters
 truncated
 
 NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl' : return code '0x2'
 Stop.
 
 
 Can anyone help me with this problem???
 
 Is there any patch for this problem???

is ptypes.cc important??


also, when i am compiling otcl i get the following error:


D:\NetSim\otcl-1.0a4>nmake /f makefile.vc

Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility   Version 6.00.8168.0
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved.

        cl -Z7 -Od -c -W3 -DCRTAPI1=_cdecl -DCRTAPI2=_cdecl -nologo
-D_X86_=1 -D
_WIN32_IE=0x0300 -DWINVER=0x0400 -DWIN32  -D_WIN32 -D_MT -D_DLL -MD -c -Zi
-W3 -
I. -I..\tcl8.1.1\generic -I..\tk8.1.1\generic  -Footcl.o otcl.c
Command line warning D4025 : overriding '/Z7' with '/Zi'
otcl.c
otcl.c(405) : warning C4101: 'saved_args2' : unreferenced local variable
otcl.c(769) : error C2039: 'isArg' : is not a member of 'CompiledLocal'
        ..\tcl8.1.1\generic\tclInt.h(543) : see declaration of
'CompiledLocal'
otcl.c(805) : warning C4013: 'TclGetStringFromObj' undefined; assuming
extern re
turning int
otcl.c(806) : warning C4047: 'function' : 'char *' differs in levels of
indirect
ion from 'int '
otcl.c(806) : warning C4024: 'Tcl_SetVar' : different types for formal and
actua
l parameter 3
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl' : return code '0x2'
Stop.

is there a patch for this??? the patch given in the bug page has already
been applied.

Thanks.
 
satish