[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ns] Does TCPFull implement SACK?

To: Karl-Johan Grinnemo <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ns] Does TCPFull implement SACK?
From: Debojyoti Dutta <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 10:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

It seems you are right 

Debo

On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Karl-Johan Grinnemo wrote:

> Does TCPFull implement SACK?
> ------------------------
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just want to confirm that "FullTcp" doesn't have SACK implemented.
> When I look through the code it seems to me that SACK isn't implemented
> in "FullTcp" but in the
> derived class "FullTcp/Sack". Is that correct?
> 
> Regards,
> Karl-Johan Grinnemo
>

References:
- [ns] Does TCPFull implement SACK?
  - From: Karl-Johan Grinnemo <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [ns] Does TCPFull implement SACK?
Next by Date: [ns] A simple question
Prev by thread: [ns] Does TCPFull implement SACK?
Next by thread: [ns] core dump when accessing contents of packet
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread