[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ns] M/M/1

To: Lloyd Wood <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ns] M/M/1
From: Debojyoti Dutta <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:52:37 -0800 (PST)
cc: Radhakrishna Sampigethaya <[email protected]>, [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Lloyd is right. I forgot to mention that the source needs to be markovian. 
To be precise droptail queueing is M/D/1. I think one can change droptail
Qs and add some randomness to model M/M/1 more accurately.

Debo

On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Lloyd Wood wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Debojyoti Dutta wrote:
> 
> > It must be same / similar to drop tail. 
> 
> ..with arrivals from a single Poisson source, surely? Has to be
> memoryless.
> 
> L.
> 
> > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Radhakrishna Sampigethaya wrote:
> > 
> > > Has anyone tried to implement an M/M/1 queue in ns-2? 
> 
> <[email protected]>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>
> 
>

References:
- Re: [ns] M/M/1
  - From: Lloyd Wood <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [ns] M/M/1
Next by Date: RE: [ns] M/M/1
Prev by thread: Re: [ns] M/M/1
Next by thread: [ns] M/M/1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread