RE: [ns] NS vs Glomosim: for wireless mobile networks

[Neundorf Alexander <Alexander.Neundorf.extern@icn.siemens.de>]

I wouldn't recommend ns for anything.

Bye
Alex


--
Free Dmitry Sklyarov ! 
http://www.freesklyarov.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Sridhar Gurivireddy [SMTP:Sridhar.Gurivireddy@usa.alcatel.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 4:46 PM
> To:	Gatorlink User
> Cc:	ns-users@ISI.EDU
> Subject:	Re: [ns] NS vs Glomosim: for wireless mobile networks
> 
> Of course ..you can use as many physical layer types, modulations, coding as you
> like.
> Ns supports multiple ll,mac,phy types at different nodes.
> 
> Sridhar guivireddy.
> 
> Gatorlink User wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >      I am a grad student working on wireless mobile networks. I have to begin
> > simulations and I have to decide whether I should use NS or Glomosim. Can anyone
> > help me decide.
> > Does NS allow us to send 2 different type of packets : for example one packet
> > could be using BPSK (Binary Phase shift keying ) and another packet could be
> > using QPSK (quadrature phase shift keying).?
> > Does NS allow us to extract distance and bandwidth parameters between nodes in a
> > network.
> > thanks
> > regards
> > Abhinav
> > -------------------
> 
> --
> Sridhar Guriviredddy,
> Mobile IP & 3GPP2 case
> Network Strategic Group,
> Alcatel, Richardson, TX-75080
> 
> Ph:  972.996.2048 (o) 972.897.7025(M) 972.671.7437(H)
>