[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ns] Why delay with no-delay link?

To: Antonello <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ns] Why delay with no-delay link?
From: Haobo Yu <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 10:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
cc: NS bulletin board <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <005601bfe8ee$3e3cdda0$67e8abd4@rupdi>
Sender: [email protected]

latency = propagation delay + transmission delay (ignore queueing delay).
you set transmission delay to 0 but you still have the former. See
Peterson and Davie's networking book...

On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Antonello wrote:

> Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 17:07:32 +0200
> From: Antonello <[email protected]>
> To: NS bulletin board <[email protected]>
> Subject: [ns] Why delay with no-delay link?
> 
> hi, I'm facing a very strange problem: if I create a simplelink or duplexlink
> with no delay (0 ms), analyzing the tracefile I expected that th differnece
> between the 'r' event and '-' event is th transmission time...but it is not
> so...why?
> 
> thanks
> @nto
> 
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ns] Why delay with no-delay link?
  - From: Lloyd Wood <[email protected]>
- Re: [ns] Why delay with no-delay link?
  - From: Bo Wen <[email protected]>

References:
- [ns] Why delay with no-delay link?
  - From: "Antonello" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [ns] need help for error Model
Next by Date: Re: [ns] how can you have a string field in a packet header?
Prev by thread: [ns] Why delay with no-delay link?
Next by thread: Re: [ns] Why delay with no-delay link?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread