Re: [ns] Why delay with no-delay link?

[Bo Wen <bowen@mail.wsu.edu>]

Why queuing delay is ignored?  When big traffics run, the queuing delay will
be inevitably introduced.

Bo
Haobo Yu wrote:

> latency = propagation delay + transmission delay (ignore queueing delay).
> you set transmission delay to 0 but you still have the former. See
> Peterson and Davie's networking book...
>
> On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Antonello wrote:
>
> > Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 17:07:32 +0200
> > From: Antonello <digioia.m@tin.it>
> > To: NS bulletin board <ns-users@ISI.EDU>
> > Subject: [ns] Why delay with no-delay link?
> >
> > hi, I'm facing a very strange problem: if I create a simplelink or duplexlink
> > with no delay (0 ms), analyzing the tracefile I expected that th differnece
> > between the 'r' event and '-' event is th transmission time...but it is not
> > so...why?
> >
> > thanks
> > @nto
> >
> >