RE: [ns] Why delay with no-delay link?

["Haobo Yu" <haoboy@isi.edu>]

Because in his case, i.e., between '-' and 'r', queueing delay is NOT taken
into account.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bwen@cougar.it.wsu.edu [mailto:bwen@cougar.it.wsu.edu]On
> Behalf Of Bo Wen
> Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 6:34 PM
> To: Haobo Yu
> Cc: Antonello; NS bulletin board
> Subject: Re: [ns] Why delay with no-delay link?
>
>
> Why queuing delay is ignored?  When big traffics run, the queuing
> delay will
> be inevitably introduced.
>
> Bo
> Haobo Yu wrote:
>
> > latency = propagation delay + transmission delay (ignore
> queueing delay).
> > you set transmission delay to 0 but you still have the former. See
> > Peterson and Davie's networking book...
> >
> > On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Antonello wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 17:07:32 +0200
> > > From: Antonello <digioia.m@tin.it>
> > > To: NS bulletin board <ns-users@ISI.EDU>
> > > Subject: [ns] Why delay with no-delay link?
> > >
> > > hi, I'm facing a very strange problem: if I create a
> simplelink or duplexlink
> > > with no delay (0 ms), analyzing the tracefile I expected that
> th differnece
> > > between the 'r' event and '-' event is th transmission
> time...but it is not
> > > so...why?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > @nto
> > >
> > >
>
>